Antly to negative, light blue if they changed significantly but remained

Antly to negative, light blue if they changed significantly but remained positive throughout, red if correlations were negative at baseline but changed to positive after therapy and green is negative relationship throughout but a significant change. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0060042.gimprovement in their cognitive function after rifaximin therapy across most cognitive domains. While our study did not evaluate mechanisms, it can be speculated that changing the gut bacterial end-product and fatty acid profile 1676428 could benefit this cognitive ability by potentially affecting the brain fatty acid profile. We observed that rifaximin does not alter the relative bacterial abundances but does promote a major shift in the complexity of the metabiome network. However, we did not measure absolute abundances of the taxa in the microbiome. Thus, there is a possibility that rifaximin may have had an impact on total microbial mass in the gut that may also play a role in the modulation of the metabiome to improve MHE. A limitation of this study was that the majority of the metabolome features were unidentified due to limitations in the GC and LC MS databases. Future studies should focus on delineating those metabolites that are at key nodes in the major network hubs of the CorrDiff or are key links between metabiome components. The fecal metabolome and small bowel microbiota analysis could have given additional insight into the mechanism of action of rifaximin. Our sample size was also limited, which could have potentially impeded our ability to characterize changes in microbial abundance, since there is considerable inter-individual microbial variability. Also our study is limited by the evaluation of fecal bacteria, which could have differing abundances from that of the colonic and small bowel mucosal bacteria [29]. However, given these limitations, we were still able to detect changes that are physiologically plausible and relevant to the ultimate result which is improvement in cognition and reduction in endotoxemia after rifaximin therapy. We have demonstrated that a systems biology approach using network correlation analysis and correlation difference analysis was much more informative in interpreting the interaction of the metabiome (i.e. phenome, microbiome and metabolome) thancurrent multivariate analyses. We postulate that the metabiome is a complex non-linear dynamic and interrogating this dynamic with one time point cannot completely capture the fluctuation in the metabolic network. Additionally, microbiome 64849-39-4 identification alone may have limited utility in that many taxa may have the same metabolic function in the gut ecosystem. Thus, methodology interrogating MedChemExpress 4-IBP functional aspects of the metabiome, such as the metabolome and metatranscriptome, should prove more informative. We conclude that rifaximin therapy has a systemic and local effect on the microbiota, metabolome, endotoxemia and cognition in patients with minimal hepatic encephalopathy. A significant improvement in cognition with reduction in endotoxemia was observed with a modest change in stool microbiota composition. There was a significant increase in serum long-chain fatty acids after rifaximin therapy. We also found a significant linkage of bacterial taxa with the metabolites, especially those linked to ammonia, aromatic amino acids and oxidative stress, which shifted to reflect changes in bacterial metabolic function after rifaximin therapy. Therefore the mechanism of action of rifaxim.Antly to negative, light blue if they changed significantly but remained positive throughout, red if correlations were negative at baseline but changed to positive after therapy and green is negative relationship throughout but a significant change. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0060042.gimprovement in their cognitive function after rifaximin therapy across most cognitive domains. While our study did not evaluate mechanisms, it can be speculated that changing the gut bacterial end-product and fatty acid profile 1676428 could benefit this cognitive ability by potentially affecting the brain fatty acid profile. We observed that rifaximin does not alter the relative bacterial abundances but does promote a major shift in the complexity of the metabiome network. However, we did not measure absolute abundances of the taxa in the microbiome. Thus, there is a possibility that rifaximin may have had an impact on total microbial mass in the gut that may also play a role in the modulation of the metabiome to improve MHE. A limitation of this study was that the majority of the metabolome features were unidentified due to limitations in the GC and LC MS databases. Future studies should focus on delineating those metabolites that are at key nodes in the major network hubs of the CorrDiff or are key links between metabiome components. The fecal metabolome and small bowel microbiota analysis could have given additional insight into the mechanism of action of rifaximin. Our sample size was also limited, which could have potentially impeded our ability to characterize changes in microbial abundance, since there is considerable inter-individual microbial variability. Also our study is limited by the evaluation of fecal bacteria, which could have differing abundances from that of the colonic and small bowel mucosal bacteria [29]. However, given these limitations, we were still able to detect changes that are physiologically plausible and relevant to the ultimate result which is improvement in cognition and reduction in endotoxemia after rifaximin therapy. We have demonstrated that a systems biology approach using network correlation analysis and correlation difference analysis was much more informative in interpreting the interaction of the metabiome (i.e. phenome, microbiome and metabolome) thancurrent multivariate analyses. We postulate that the metabiome is a complex non-linear dynamic and interrogating this dynamic with one time point cannot completely capture the fluctuation in the metabolic network. Additionally, microbiome identification alone may have limited utility in that many taxa may have the same metabolic function in the gut ecosystem. Thus, methodology interrogating functional aspects of the metabiome, such as the metabolome and metatranscriptome, should prove more informative. We conclude that rifaximin therapy has a systemic and local effect on the microbiota, metabolome, endotoxemia and cognition in patients with minimal hepatic encephalopathy. A significant improvement in cognition with reduction in endotoxemia was observed with a modest change in stool microbiota composition. There was a significant increase in serum long-chain fatty acids after rifaximin therapy. We also found a significant linkage of bacterial taxa with the metabolites, especially those linked to ammonia, aromatic amino acids and oxidative stress, which shifted to reflect changes in bacterial metabolic function after rifaximin therapy. Therefore the mechanism of action of rifaxim.