His network contains only 1490 features, which is substantially smaller than the

His network contains only 1490 features, which is substantially smaller than the original BCN with only 67 of the original features. Visual inspection of the CorrDiff (Figure 4E) shows a more complex network of hubs that is reflected in the Network Heterogeneity (2.012) and Clustering Coefficient (0.79). Additionally, one can see that a number of correlations involving bacteria (red squares) were changed by the rifaximin treatment Figure 4D). We found five bacterial taxa (Enterobacteriaceae, Bacteroidaceae, 1676428 Veillonellaceae, Porphyromonadaceae and Rikenellaceae) that showed a significant difference in correlations before rifaximin compared to after rifaximin using the correlation difference network. Subnets centered on these taxa from the global BCN and ACN were then visualized (figures S3 7 in File42.3613.4 97.2631.9 50.0612.3 25.9611.9 121.7632.1 41.2628.3 69.6625.37.368.9* 85.7625.8* 55.1613.9* 28.569.6 96.4633.1* 24.8617.1* 61.0617.3*doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0060042.t(3, 15 ) and others (2, 10 ). There was a significant improvement in serum bilirubin but not the other MELD score components at the end of the trial (Table 1). There was also a significant improvement in GHRH (1-29) chemical information cognitive performance on all tests apart from the block design test compared to the pre-treatment baseline. There was a significant reduction in endotoxin levels after rifaximin therapy compared 25837696 to baseline (0.5560.21 vs. 0.4860.24 Eu/ml, p = 0.02).Microbiome ChangesThere was no significant difference in the overall microbiome composition before and after rifaximin upon visual inspection of the principal component analysis (Figure 2A). UNIFRAC PCO analysis also did not show a significant clustering between the microbiota composition before and after rifaximin (Figure S1). However, the UNIFRAC Bonferroni corrected, weighted significance test for the treatments was indicated a slight difference between the microbiome compositions (p = 0.01) There was a significant reduction in the abundance of the taxa Veillonellaceae (p = 0.025) and increase in the abundance of Eubacteriaceae (p = 0.042) using Metastats but no other significant changes in the microbiome abundance were observed after rifaximin therapy (Figures 2B and 2C).Metabolome AnalysisThere was a significant difference in serum and urine metabolites between groups before and after rifaximin using Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA) (figures S2A and B). Uni-variate analysis of serum metabolites (Figure 3) showed that the majority of the differentiators were serum fatty acids that increased after rifaximin therapy. The pattern of fatty acid increase after rifaximin were a higher level of purchase Pentagastrin saturated fatty acids [caprylic (8:0), myristic (14:0) and palimitic acid (16:0)] which after the action of stearoyl-CoA desaturase can be turned into palmitoleic acid (16:1n7), oleic (18:1n9) and eicosanoic acid (20:1n9). An increase in linolenic acid (18:3n3), gamma-linolenic acid, linoleic (18:2n6) and arachidonic acid (20:3n6) formed by the action of delta 6-desaturase and fatty acid elongase was also seen. There was also an increase in serum fructose, succinic acid andMetabiome and Rifaximin in CirrhosisFigure 2. A: Principal Component Analysis of Microbiota. There was no significant change in the PCO of microbiota before and after rifaximin therapy (yellow dots are before and red dots are after rifaximin) B and C: Composition of microbiota families before (figure 2B) and after (figure 2C) rifaximin. There was a s.His network contains only 1490 features, which is substantially smaller than the original BCN with only 67 of the original features. Visual inspection of the CorrDiff (Figure 4E) shows a more complex network of hubs that is reflected in the Network Heterogeneity (2.012) and Clustering Coefficient (0.79). Additionally, one can see that a number of correlations involving bacteria (red squares) were changed by the rifaximin treatment Figure 4D). We found five bacterial taxa (Enterobacteriaceae, Bacteroidaceae, 1676428 Veillonellaceae, Porphyromonadaceae and Rikenellaceae) that showed a significant difference in correlations before rifaximin compared to after rifaximin using the correlation difference network. Subnets centered on these taxa from the global BCN and ACN were then visualized (figures S3 7 in File42.3613.4 97.2631.9 50.0612.3 25.9611.9 121.7632.1 41.2628.3 69.6625.37.368.9* 85.7625.8* 55.1613.9* 28.569.6 96.4633.1* 24.8617.1* 61.0617.3*doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0060042.t(3, 15 ) and others (2, 10 ). There was a significant improvement in serum bilirubin but not the other MELD score components at the end of the trial (Table 1). There was also a significant improvement in cognitive performance on all tests apart from the block design test compared to the pre-treatment baseline. There was a significant reduction in endotoxin levels after rifaximin therapy compared 25837696 to baseline (0.5560.21 vs. 0.4860.24 Eu/ml, p = 0.02).Microbiome ChangesThere was no significant difference in the overall microbiome composition before and after rifaximin upon visual inspection of the principal component analysis (Figure 2A). UNIFRAC PCO analysis also did not show a significant clustering between the microbiota composition before and after rifaximin (Figure S1). However, the UNIFRAC Bonferroni corrected, weighted significance test for the treatments was indicated a slight difference between the microbiome compositions (p = 0.01) There was a significant reduction in the abundance of the taxa Veillonellaceae (p = 0.025) and increase in the abundance of Eubacteriaceae (p = 0.042) using Metastats but no other significant changes in the microbiome abundance were observed after rifaximin therapy (Figures 2B and 2C).Metabolome AnalysisThere was a significant difference in serum and urine metabolites between groups before and after rifaximin using Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA) (figures S2A and B). Uni-variate analysis of serum metabolites (Figure 3) showed that the majority of the differentiators were serum fatty acids that increased after rifaximin therapy. The pattern of fatty acid increase after rifaximin were a higher level of saturated fatty acids [caprylic (8:0), myristic (14:0) and palimitic acid (16:0)] which after the action of stearoyl-CoA desaturase can be turned into palmitoleic acid (16:1n7), oleic (18:1n9) and eicosanoic acid (20:1n9). An increase in linolenic acid (18:3n3), gamma-linolenic acid, linoleic (18:2n6) and arachidonic acid (20:3n6) formed by the action of delta 6-desaturase and fatty acid elongase was also seen. There was also an increase in serum fructose, succinic acid andMetabiome and Rifaximin in CirrhosisFigure 2. A: Principal Component Analysis of Microbiota. There was no significant change in the PCO of microbiota before and after rifaximin therapy (yellow dots are before and red dots are after rifaximin) B and C: Composition of microbiota families before (figure 2B) and after (figure 2C) rifaximin. There was a s.