Ting with an ultrathin gold layer. Then the specimens are observed under SEM (1000-B, AMRAY, Bedford, MA, USA) to assess investigate morphological features of the attached cells and ECM fibers formed on scaffolds.The mice were killed by decapitation 4, 8, and 12 weeks after implantation (n = 8, for each time point). Each mouse was placed in a supine position and examined by X-ray radiography. The implants were retrieved, stripped of soft tissues, and weighted wet. They were also analyzed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (Challenge, DMS, Montpellier, France) for bone mineral densities.Histological analysisHistological SMER 28 cost analysis of the implants was undertaken at 12 weeks after surgery. Specimens from the bone defect sites were fixed with 4 paraformalclehyde for 48 hours, decalcified with 0.5 mol/L EDTA for 2 weeks, dehydrated with gradient ethanol solutions for 2 days, vitrified with dimethylbenzene, embedded in paraffin, and cut to yield 6 mm thick sections. The sections were stained with haematoxylin and eosin (H E) for histological evaluation and examined under light microscope.In vivo osteogenesisThe in vivo osteogenetic activities of scaffolds and cell-scaffold constructs were evaluated with a subcutaneous implantation model in 24 nude mice. Each mouse received four implants in its back, termed implants I V (Table 2). Implant I was a cell-free DBM scaffold and placed at the left rostral position. Implant II was a cell-scaffold construct seeded with 26107/ml hMSCs by the hydrogel-assisted method followed by dynamic culture for 12 d; this was placed at the right rostral position. Implant III was a construct seeded with 16108/ml hMSCs by the hydrogel-assisted method; it was placed at the left caudal position immediately after seeding without in vitro culture. Our pretest found that during the 12-day dynamic culture (as in Implant II), cell proliferation in the scaffold increased by 10 fold (data not shown). Therefore, to ensure an equal cell density before in vivo implantation, the initial cell density for implant III was 9 times greater than implant II. Implant IV was a construct seeded with 26107/ml hMSCs by the hydrogel-assisted method followed by static flask culture for 12 d; it was placed at the right caudal position. Table 2. Implant groups for subcutaneous implantation.Statistical analysesData were expressed as mean 6 standard deviation. Data were analyzed by one-way analyses of variance (ANOVA) and Student?Newman euls (SNK) post hoc tests using SPSS 12.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.order Pleuromutilin Results Cell culture and characterizationThe hMSCs tended to form calcium nodus after 12 d conditional culture (Fig. 1A). The hMSCs also stained immunohistochemically positive for ALP (Fig. 1B and C), osteocalcin (Fig. 1E and F) and collagen type I (Fig. 1H and I) after 12-day osteogenic induction. The ALP activity of hMSCs (Fig. 1D) and osteocalcin concentration (Fig. 1G) in the culture medium were significantly higher in induced group than that in control group (P,0. 01).Group I II III IVScaffold DBM DBM DBM DBMSeeding condision no Hydrogel-assisted Hydrogel-assisted Hydrogel-assistedCell number per scaffold no 1.06106 1.06107 1.Culture time no dynamic culture 12 d no static flask culture 12 dPlace in nude mouse left rostral right rostral left caudal right caudaldoi:10.1371/journal.pone.0053697.tEffects of Initial Cell and Hydrodynamic CultureFigure 1. The culture and characteriz.Ting with an ultrathin gold layer. Then the specimens are observed under SEM (1000-B, AMRAY, Bedford, MA, USA) to assess investigate morphological features of the attached cells and ECM fibers formed on scaffolds.The mice were killed by decapitation 4, 8, and 12 weeks after implantation (n = 8, for each time point). Each mouse was placed in a supine position and examined by X-ray radiography. The implants were retrieved, stripped of soft tissues, and weighted wet. They were also analyzed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (Challenge, DMS, Montpellier, France) for bone mineral densities.Histological analysisHistological analysis of the implants was undertaken at 12 weeks after surgery. Specimens from the bone defect sites were fixed with 4 paraformalclehyde for 48 hours, decalcified with 0.5 mol/L EDTA for 2 weeks, dehydrated with gradient ethanol solutions for 2 days, vitrified with dimethylbenzene, embedded in paraffin, and cut to yield 6 mm thick sections. The sections were stained with haematoxylin and eosin (H E) for histological evaluation and examined under light microscope.In vivo osteogenesisThe in vivo osteogenetic activities of scaffolds and cell-scaffold constructs were evaluated with a subcutaneous implantation model in 24 nude mice. Each mouse received four implants in its back, termed implants I V (Table 2). Implant I was a cell-free DBM scaffold and placed at the left rostral position. Implant II was a cell-scaffold construct seeded with 26107/ml hMSCs by the hydrogel-assisted method followed by dynamic culture for 12 d; this was placed at the right rostral position. Implant III was a construct seeded with 16108/ml hMSCs by the hydrogel-assisted method; it was placed at the left caudal position immediately after seeding without in vitro culture. Our pretest found that during the 12-day dynamic culture (as in Implant II), cell proliferation in the scaffold increased by 10 fold (data not shown). Therefore, to ensure an equal cell density before in vivo implantation, the initial cell density for implant III was 9 times greater than implant II. Implant IV was a construct seeded with 26107/ml hMSCs by the hydrogel-assisted method followed by static flask culture for 12 d; it was placed at the right caudal position. Table 2. Implant groups for subcutaneous implantation.Statistical analysesData were expressed as mean 6 standard deviation. Data were analyzed by one-way analyses of variance (ANOVA) and Student?Newman euls (SNK) post hoc tests using SPSS 12.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results Cell culture and characterizationThe hMSCs tended to form calcium nodus after 12 d conditional culture (Fig. 1A). The hMSCs also stained immunohistochemically positive for ALP (Fig. 1B and C), osteocalcin (Fig. 1E and F) and collagen type I (Fig. 1H and I) after 12-day osteogenic induction. The ALP activity of hMSCs (Fig. 1D) and osteocalcin concentration (Fig. 1G) in the culture medium were significantly higher in induced group than that in control group (P,0. 01).Group I II III IVScaffold DBM DBM DBM DBMSeeding condision no Hydrogel-assisted Hydrogel-assisted Hydrogel-assistedCell number per scaffold no 1.06106 1.06107 1.Culture time no dynamic culture 12 d no static flask culture 12 dPlace in nude mouse left rostral right rostral left caudal right caudaldoi:10.1371/journal.pone.0053697.tEffects of Initial Cell and Hydrodynamic CultureFigure 1. The culture and characteriz.
Nucleoside Analogues nucleoside-analogue.com
Just another WordPress site