Evels of PDF1.2 were elevated between 15- and 1269-fold than that

Evels of PDF1.2 were elevated between 15- and 1269-fold than that of the control (Figure 5C). The statistics analysis showed that the observed differences were statistically significant. The AaERF1-overexpression lines were observed following inoculation with B. cinerea. For each of the AaERF1-overexpression lines, we observed a significant reduction in the development of disease symptoms in independent inoculation experiments. Four days following inoculation with B. cinerea, 79 of the control plants showed symptoms of infection, whereas only between 32 and 42 of the leaves from AaERF1-overexpression lines were symptomatic (Figure 6A, 6C). The statistics analysis showed that the observed differences were statistically significant. The control plants turned dry and died, while most of the AaERF1-overexpression plants were growing well (Figure 6B, 6C). The results showed that the overexpression of Homotaurine cost AaERF1 could increase the disease resistance to B. cinerea in Arabidopsis.Down-regulated Expression Level of AaERF1 in A. annua Causes the Reduction of Disease Resistance to B. cinereaHere, we constructed the RNAi vector of AaERF1 and transformed it into A. annua. The control experiment involving the transfer of empty plasmid pCAMBIA2300+ to A. annua was also conducted. The transgenic plants were first confirmed by genomic DNA-based PCR using the 35S forward primer, AaERF1 reverse primer and the reverse primer of kanamycin-resistant gene (Figure S3), and then three independent transgenic lines were chosen for further analysis. In the RNAi transgenic lines, the transcript levels of AaERF1 were suppressed to 46?1 of the control level (Figure 7A). The statistics analysis showed that the observed differences were statistically significant. The three independent AaERF1i lines were inoculated with B. cinerea. The results showed that each of the AaERF1i lines had a significant reduction in the disease symptoms in three independent inoculations. Six days following inoculation with B. cinerea, most of the leaves in AaERF1i lines were dry and dead, while most of the the control plants were growing well (Figure 7B). The results showed that AaERF1 was a positive regulator to the disease resistance to B. cinerea in A. annua.AaERF1 Regulates the Resistance to B. cinereaFigure 2. Localization of AaERF1 expression using GUS staining of promoter:GUS transgenic plants. GUS activity is revealed by histochemical staining. (A) Root. (B) Stem. (C) Leaf. (D) Flower buds. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0057657.gDiscussionThe putative cis-acting elements of AaERF1 promoter were predicted as shown in Figure1A and summarized in Table 1. The W box (TTGAC) is the binding site 18204824 for members of the WRKY family of transcription factors [20]. The importance of W boxeswas illustrated by studies on Arabidopsis transcription during systemic-acquired resistance [21]. Previous reports indicated that the G-box elated hexamers(CACNTG,CACATG and (T/ C)ACGTG)are the binding sites of MYC2 [22?4]. MYC2 is a negative regulator of the JA-responsive pathogen defense genes PDF1.2 and B-CHI [25]. At -209bp of AaERF1 promoter, there isTable 1. Putative cis-acting regulatory elements involved in defense responsiveness in AaERF1 promoter.Fexinidazole site Cis-elements5-UTR pyrimidine-rich stretch consensus: TTTCTTCTCT EIRE-box: TTGACC W-box consensus: TTGAC TGA-box: TGACGTCA G/C-box consensus: CACGTC TC-rich repeats: ATTTTCTTCAMotif and position 21345 AGAGAAGAAA -1336 2336 TTGACC -331 2547 TTGAC -542; -336 TTGAC -332.Evels of PDF1.2 were elevated between 15- and 1269-fold than that of the control (Figure 5C). The statistics analysis showed that the observed differences were statistically significant. The AaERF1-overexpression lines were observed following inoculation with B. cinerea. For each of the AaERF1-overexpression lines, we observed a significant reduction in the development of disease symptoms in independent inoculation experiments. Four days following inoculation with B. cinerea, 79 of the control plants showed symptoms of infection, whereas only between 32 and 42 of the leaves from AaERF1-overexpression lines were symptomatic (Figure 6A, 6C). The statistics analysis showed that the observed differences were statistically significant. The control plants turned dry and died, while most of the AaERF1-overexpression plants were growing well (Figure 6B, 6C). The results showed that the overexpression of AaERF1 could increase the disease resistance to B. cinerea in Arabidopsis.Down-regulated Expression Level of AaERF1 in A. annua Causes the Reduction of Disease Resistance to B. cinereaHere, we constructed the RNAi vector of AaERF1 and transformed it into A. annua. The control experiment involving the transfer of empty plasmid pCAMBIA2300+ to A. annua was also conducted. The transgenic plants were first confirmed by genomic DNA-based PCR using the 35S forward primer, AaERF1 reverse primer and the reverse primer of kanamycin-resistant gene (Figure S3), and then three independent transgenic lines were chosen for further analysis. In the RNAi transgenic lines, the transcript levels of AaERF1 were suppressed to 46?1 of the control level (Figure 7A). The statistics analysis showed that the observed differences were statistically significant. The three independent AaERF1i lines were inoculated with B. cinerea. The results showed that each of the AaERF1i lines had a significant reduction in the disease symptoms in three independent inoculations. Six days following inoculation with B. cinerea, most of the leaves in AaERF1i lines were dry and dead, while most of the the control plants were growing well (Figure 7B). The results showed that AaERF1 was a positive regulator to the disease resistance to B. cinerea in A. annua.AaERF1 Regulates the Resistance to B. cinereaFigure 2. Localization of AaERF1 expression using GUS staining of promoter:GUS transgenic plants. GUS activity is revealed by histochemical staining. (A) Root. (B) Stem. (C) Leaf. (D) Flower buds. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0057657.gDiscussionThe putative cis-acting elements of AaERF1 promoter were predicted as shown in Figure1A and summarized in Table 1. The W box (TTGAC) is the binding site 18204824 for members of the WRKY family of transcription factors [20]. The importance of W boxeswas illustrated by studies on Arabidopsis transcription during systemic-acquired resistance [21]. Previous reports indicated that the G-box elated hexamers(CACNTG,CACATG and (T/ C)ACGTG)are the binding sites of MYC2 [22?4]. MYC2 is a negative regulator of the JA-responsive pathogen defense genes PDF1.2 and B-CHI [25]. At -209bp of AaERF1 promoter, there isTable 1. Putative cis-acting regulatory elements involved in defense responsiveness in AaERF1 promoter.Cis-elements5-UTR pyrimidine-rich stretch consensus: TTTCTTCTCT EIRE-box: TTGACC W-box consensus: TTGAC TGA-box: TGACGTCA G/C-box consensus: CACGTC TC-rich repeats: ATTTTCTTCAMotif and position 21345 AGAGAAGAAA -1336 2336 TTGACC -331 2547 TTGAC -542; -336 TTGAC -332.