Ctivation and by a disruption of the formation of an IRFs

Ctivation and by a disruption of the formation of an IRFs/p65 activator/coactivator complex [25]. In contrast, inhibition of TLR4 and 9 by Proxisome Proliferator Activated Receptor (PPAR)-c was reported to be p65 independent and mediated by prevention of the clearance of the Nuclear Corepressor (NcoR) complex from the promoter of specific set of genes involved in inflammation [12,13]. A similar mechanism, i.e. stabilization of NCoR to the promoter of Interleukin(IL)-1b, Tumor Necrosis Factor(TNF)-a and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), mediates counter-regulatory effects of FXR in LPS stimulated macrophages, indicating a common theme for nuclear receptors in regulating TLRs signaling [19]. In the present study we have extended further on the reciprocal regulation between FXR and TLRs by revealing that FXR takes part into a regulatory loop that is specifically activated by TLR-9. Indeed, analysis of the effects exerted by members of human TLR family on FXR gene expression led to the discovery that activation of membrane associated TLRs (i.e. TLR4) in 256373-96-3 cost macrophages downregulates the expression of FXR, while activation of TLR9, a prototype of endosomal TLRs, by CpG upregulates theFXR Is a Novel TLR-9 Target GeneFigure 3. FXR agonism protects against colitis development in TLR92/2 mice. TNBS colitis was induced in TLR9+/+ and TLR92/2 mice. Mice were administered 6-ECDCA, a FXR agonist, as described in materials and methods. (A ) Analysis of Disease activity index (DAI) in TLR9+/+ (A) and TLR92/2 mice (C). (B ) Analysis of I-BRD9 price mucosal damage score in TLR9+/+ (B) and TLR92/2 mice (D). (E ) H E staining of representative paraffinembedded sections from distal colons after administration of vehicle (control mice), TNBS or TNBS plus 6-ECDCA in TLR9+/+ (panels E ) and TLR92/2 (H ) mice. Data are mean 6 SE of 6 animals.*P,0.05 versus wild type naive mice. #P,0.05 versus wild type mice administered TNBS. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0054472.gexpression of FXR. Importantly the effects exerted by CpG were restricted to FXR, because activation of TLR-9 induces only the expression of FXR and its target gene SHP, but failed to upregulate the expression of other nuclear receptors including PPARs, LXRs, RXR, RAR and GR, among the others. Together with the fact that the regulatory effects exerted by CpG on FXR gene expression were lost in macrophages isolated from the TLR92/2 mice, these data illustrates that TLR9 triggers a specific program that lead to a direct up-regulation of FXR and its target gene SHP. Because SHP interacts and inhibits the transcription factor AP-1 [26], a positive regulator of inflammatory response, these data support the notion that, in addition to regulating the expression of a/b interferons, TLR9 induces an additional regulatory system based on two nuclear receptors, FXR and SHP, that functions as braking signals for inflammation in the intestine. Accordingly, FXR deficient mice develop a proinflammatory and profibrotic phenotype in the intestine and are prone to develop bacterial overgrowth and exacerbated colitis in response to TNBS [15,16,19]. Moreover, the survival of these mice in response to TNBS administration is reduced in comparison to C57/BL6 mice and the treatment with an FXR agonist fails to protect against colitis development [19]. The essential role of TLR9/FXR interaction in shaping intestinal immune responses was further investigated by usingspecific TLRs and FXR deficient mice challenged with TNBS, a model of colonic.Ctivation and by a disruption of the formation of an IRFs/p65 activator/coactivator complex [25]. In contrast, inhibition of TLR4 and 9 by Proxisome Proliferator Activated Receptor (PPAR)-c was reported to be p65 independent and mediated by prevention of the clearance of the Nuclear Corepressor (NcoR) complex from the promoter of specific set of genes involved in inflammation [12,13]. A similar mechanism, i.e. stabilization of NCoR to the promoter of Interleukin(IL)-1b, Tumor Necrosis Factor(TNF)-a and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), mediates counter-regulatory effects of FXR in LPS stimulated macrophages, indicating a common theme for nuclear receptors in regulating TLRs signaling [19]. In the present study we have extended further on the reciprocal regulation between FXR and TLRs by revealing that FXR takes part into a regulatory loop that is specifically activated by TLR-9. Indeed, analysis of the effects exerted by members of human TLR family on FXR gene expression led to the discovery that activation of membrane associated TLRs (i.e. TLR4) in macrophages downregulates the expression of FXR, while activation of TLR9, a prototype of endosomal TLRs, by CpG upregulates theFXR Is a Novel TLR-9 Target GeneFigure 3. FXR agonism protects against colitis development in TLR92/2 mice. TNBS colitis was induced in TLR9+/+ and TLR92/2 mice. Mice were administered 6-ECDCA, a FXR agonist, as described in materials and methods. (A ) Analysis of Disease activity index (DAI) in TLR9+/+ (A) and TLR92/2 mice (C). (B ) Analysis of mucosal damage score in TLR9+/+ (B) and TLR92/2 mice (D). (E ) H E staining of representative paraffinembedded sections from distal colons after administration of vehicle (control mice), TNBS or TNBS plus 6-ECDCA in TLR9+/+ (panels E ) and TLR92/2 (H ) mice. Data are mean 6 SE of 6 animals.*P,0.05 versus wild type naive mice. #P,0.05 versus wild type mice administered TNBS. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0054472.gexpression of FXR. Importantly the effects exerted by CpG were restricted to FXR, because activation of TLR-9 induces only the expression of FXR and its target gene SHP, but failed to upregulate the expression of other nuclear receptors including PPARs, LXRs, RXR, RAR and GR, among the others. Together with the fact that the regulatory effects exerted by CpG on FXR gene expression were lost in macrophages isolated from the TLR92/2 mice, these data illustrates that TLR9 triggers a specific program that lead to a direct up-regulation of FXR and its target gene SHP. Because SHP interacts and inhibits the transcription factor AP-1 [26], a positive regulator of inflammatory response, these data support the notion that, in addition to regulating the expression of a/b interferons, TLR9 induces an additional regulatory system based on two nuclear receptors, FXR and SHP, that functions as braking signals for inflammation in the intestine. Accordingly, FXR deficient mice develop a proinflammatory and profibrotic phenotype in the intestine and are prone to develop bacterial overgrowth and exacerbated colitis in response to TNBS [15,16,19]. Moreover, the survival of these mice in response to TNBS administration is reduced in comparison to C57/BL6 mice and the treatment with an FXR agonist fails to protect against colitis development [19]. The essential role of TLR9/FXR interaction in shaping intestinal immune responses was further investigated by usingspecific TLRs and FXR deficient mice challenged with TNBS, a model of colonic.