Share this post on:

Ith Zn2+ and digitonin; G) NLS-ZapCmR2 is similar to ZapCmR1.1. Representative traces are mean 6 s.e.m. (n = 4 cells). Each experiment was repeated a minimum of three times. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049371.gbalanced salt (HHBSS) media (5.36 mM KCl, 137 mM NaCl, 16.65 mM D-Glucose, and 30 mM HEPES) pH 7.4. This buffer is made in our laboratory because phosphates are known to precipitate Zn2+. Buffer was generated with Chelex-100-treated water (Sigma Aldrich). Cell imaging was performed on a Zeiss Axiovert 200 M microscope with a Cascade 512B CCD camera (Roper Scientific) and Xenon arc lamp (XBO75) using MetaFluor software (Universal Imaging) to operate the system. All excitation filters, dichroic mirrors, and emission filters (Chroma Technology or Semrock) are presented in Table S2. The following settings were used: exposure time 400 msec, 20?0 second acquisition rate, 1.3NA 406 23727046 oil immersion objective, and excitation light was attenuated with either a 10 neutral density filter for tSapphire paired with mKO or TagRFP as well as for Clover and mRuby2 and 5 neutral density filter for MK-8742 mOrange2 paired with mCherry or mKATE as well as for the CFP-YFP pair.background corrected FRET ratio was measured for each compartment as described above.Results Measurement of get E7449 spectral BleedthroughGiven the lack of consensus on an optimal green-red or redorange FRET pair, we decided to test 5 different alternate FRET pairs in the zinc sensor platform. Table 1 summarizes the sensors generated using tSapphire, an ultra-violet (UV) excitable FP [18], Clover [19], mKO [20], mOrange2 [21], TagRFP [22], mCherry [23], mKATE [24], or mRuby2 [19], and Figure S1 presents the absorption and emission spectra of purified sensor proteins. Because these FRET sensors are ratiometric, emission of the donor FP decreases while emission of the acceptor FP increases upon Zn2+ binding. An important consideration when evaluating whether multiple FRET sensors can be used simultaneously in cells is the extent of spectral crosstalk between individual FPs and FRET constructs. Spectral crosstalk generally refers to the presence of fluorescence signal from more than one species in a single optical channel. The extent of crosstalk is given by the percent bleedthrough (or contamination) of a given fluorescent species in an optical channel. Because FRET ratios are calculated using the FRET optical channel and the donor optical channel, we felt it was important to determine bleedthrough in both of these channels. For the donor channel, HeLa cells were transfected with cDNA encoding an individual FP and the fluorescence intensity was measured in all channels. Table S3 and Figures S2 and S3 present the percent bleedthrough in each of the donor channels (CFP, tSapphire, mOrange2, and Clover), which was less than 5 in all cases. For the FRET channel, constructs in Table 1 were transfected into cells and the intensity was measured in each of the FRET channels (Figure S4 and Table S4). When pairing CFPYFP with a green-red sensor, there was substantial bleedthrough of Clover-mRuby2, tSapphire-TagRFP and tSapphire-mKO into the CFP-YFP FRET channel (50 , 96 , and 80 , respectively), and,10 of CFP-YFP into the green-red channels. This indicates that if one of these green-red sensors is to be used alongside a CFY-YFP sensor, the sensors need to be in non-overlapping spatial locations. Spectral crosstalk was minimized by pairing CFP-YFP with an orange-red sensor (,3 for all combinations).Live Cel.Ith Zn2+ and digitonin; G) NLS-ZapCmR2 is similar to ZapCmR1.1. Representative traces are mean 6 s.e.m. (n = 4 cells). Each experiment was repeated a minimum of three times. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049371.gbalanced salt (HHBSS) media (5.36 mM KCl, 137 mM NaCl, 16.65 mM D-Glucose, and 30 mM HEPES) pH 7.4. This buffer is made in our laboratory because phosphates are known to precipitate Zn2+. Buffer was generated with Chelex-100-treated water (Sigma Aldrich). Cell imaging was performed on a Zeiss Axiovert 200 M microscope with a Cascade 512B CCD camera (Roper Scientific) and Xenon arc lamp (XBO75) using MetaFluor software (Universal Imaging) to operate the system. All excitation filters, dichroic mirrors, and emission filters (Chroma Technology or Semrock) are presented in Table S2. The following settings were used: exposure time 400 msec, 20?0 second acquisition rate, 1.3NA 406 23727046 oil immersion objective, and excitation light was attenuated with either a 10 neutral density filter for tSapphire paired with mKO or TagRFP as well as for Clover and mRuby2 and 5 neutral density filter for mOrange2 paired with mCherry or mKATE as well as for the CFP-YFP pair.background corrected FRET ratio was measured for each compartment as described above.Results Measurement of Spectral BleedthroughGiven the lack of consensus on an optimal green-red or redorange FRET pair, we decided to test 5 different alternate FRET pairs in the zinc sensor platform. Table 1 summarizes the sensors generated using tSapphire, an ultra-violet (UV) excitable FP [18], Clover [19], mKO [20], mOrange2 [21], TagRFP [22], mCherry [23], mKATE [24], or mRuby2 [19], and Figure S1 presents the absorption and emission spectra of purified sensor proteins. Because these FRET sensors are ratiometric, emission of the donor FP decreases while emission of the acceptor FP increases upon Zn2+ binding. An important consideration when evaluating whether multiple FRET sensors can be used simultaneously in cells is the extent of spectral crosstalk between individual FPs and FRET constructs. Spectral crosstalk generally refers to the presence of fluorescence signal from more than one species in a single optical channel. The extent of crosstalk is given by the percent bleedthrough (or contamination) of a given fluorescent species in an optical channel. Because FRET ratios are calculated using the FRET optical channel and the donor optical channel, we felt it was important to determine bleedthrough in both of these channels. For the donor channel, HeLa cells were transfected with cDNA encoding an individual FP and the fluorescence intensity was measured in all channels. Table S3 and Figures S2 and S3 present the percent bleedthrough in each of the donor channels (CFP, tSapphire, mOrange2, and Clover), which was less than 5 in all cases. For the FRET channel, constructs in Table 1 were transfected into cells and the intensity was measured in each of the FRET channels (Figure S4 and Table S4). When pairing CFPYFP with a green-red sensor, there was substantial bleedthrough of Clover-mRuby2, tSapphire-TagRFP and tSapphire-mKO into the CFP-YFP FRET channel (50 , 96 , and 80 , respectively), and,10 of CFP-YFP into the green-red channels. This indicates that if one of these green-red sensors is to be used alongside a CFY-YFP sensor, the sensors need to be in non-overlapping spatial locations. Spectral crosstalk was minimized by pairing CFP-YFP with an orange-red sensor (,3 for all combinations).Live Cel.

Share this post on:

Author: nucleoside analogue