Eir field, whose necessity should be questioned and discussed.”6 Similar efforts

Eir field, whose necessity should be questioned and discussed.”6 Similar efforts are now happening abroad. NPA’s Good Stewardship work challenged physicians to acknowledge and address prescribers’ responsibility for systemic waste and consequent patient harm. Organized medicine has begun to embrace stewardship as a core component of professionalism, and consumers have welcomed this awakening. It was no trivial thing to shift the national conversation in this direction. The challenge now is to see these values broadly translated to practice. New and broad-ranging calls for price transparency and BLU-554 site fairness are providing wind at the back of this push for high-value care. In short, as a nonprofit organization without a great deal of money, NPA has made a great deal of difference. With little more than stamina, purpose, and a value set that aligns the incentives of physicians with those of patients, the NPA has been able to make important contributions in a short period of time. At ten years old, the NPA continues to attract physicians who understand that the future of US health care will be shaped by those who show up to shape it–and that working with patients, we now have a historic opportunity to put health at the heart of medicine. There are gains to be defended and new battles to engage. Relatively recent areas of NPA focus also continue to build momentum, including the creation of NPA national taskforces on gun violence prevention and on the FDA’s drug and medical device approval processes–two areas brought to the fore during Cheryl Bettigole, MD, MPH’s, LY2510924 biological activity tenure as NPA President. Although these issues mayLOOKING AHEADThe Permanente Journal/ Summer 2015/ Volume 19 No.COMMENTARYNew Kid on the Block Turns Ten! The Brief, Remarkable History of the National Physicians Allianceat first seem to have little to do with one another or with past NPA efforts to expand access to high-quality health care, they are united by the influence of corporate lobbying. The National Rifle Association’s lobbyists have choked off research funding for gun violence prevention7,8 and have successfully backed state laws that forbid physicians from asking standard screening questions about gun ownership and storage.9 Fracking companies have successfully backed the passage of state laws that require physicians to sign confidentiality agreements before learning what chemicals a sick patient may have been exposed to.10,11 Drug companies continue to press the FDA to approve applications on the basis of surrogate endpoint data and mathematical modeling rather than requiring full clinical trials.12 And far too many medical devices continue to reach the market without any clinical trials at all.13 These are areas that cry out for more attention from organized medicine to ensure patient safety. For our federal watchdog agencies, our clinical guidelines, our pharmacopeia, our educational resources, our state laws, and our individual clinical relationships to be grounded in trust and science, physicians and patients will have to claim more power in these debates. It is fair to say that with my background in medicine and medical history, I never expected to become the Executive Director of a nonprofit organization. But I have always been drawn to visionaries. I had the good fortune to help unite this multispecialty band of serious idealists, this growing force for good. NPA’s presidents have included asurgeon, Dr Vaias; four family practice physicians–Drs Evans, Bettigole, Sc.Eir field, whose necessity should be questioned and discussed.”6 Similar efforts are now happening abroad. NPA’s Good Stewardship work challenged physicians to acknowledge and address prescribers’ responsibility for systemic waste and consequent patient harm. Organized medicine has begun to embrace stewardship as a core component of professionalism, and consumers have welcomed this awakening. It was no trivial thing to shift the national conversation in this direction. The challenge now is to see these values broadly translated to practice. New and broad-ranging calls for price transparency and fairness are providing wind at the back of this push for high-value care. In short, as a nonprofit organization without a great deal of money, NPA has made a great deal of difference. With little more than stamina, purpose, and a value set that aligns the incentives of physicians with those of patients, the NPA has been able to make important contributions in a short period of time. At ten years old, the NPA continues to attract physicians who understand that the future of US health care will be shaped by those who show up to shape it–and that working with patients, we now have a historic opportunity to put health at the heart of medicine. There are gains to be defended and new battles to engage. Relatively recent areas of NPA focus also continue to build momentum, including the creation of NPA national taskforces on gun violence prevention and on the FDA’s drug and medical device approval processes–two areas brought to the fore during Cheryl Bettigole, MD, MPH’s, tenure as NPA President. Although these issues mayLOOKING AHEADThe Permanente Journal/ Summer 2015/ Volume 19 No.COMMENTARYNew Kid on the Block Turns Ten! The Brief, Remarkable History of the National Physicians Allianceat first seem to have little to do with one another or with past NPA efforts to expand access to high-quality health care, they are united by the influence of corporate lobbying. The National Rifle Association’s lobbyists have choked off research funding for gun violence prevention7,8 and have successfully backed state laws that forbid physicians from asking standard screening questions about gun ownership and storage.9 Fracking companies have successfully backed the passage of state laws that require physicians to sign confidentiality agreements before learning what chemicals a sick patient may have been exposed to.10,11 Drug companies continue to press the FDA to approve applications on the basis of surrogate endpoint data and mathematical modeling rather than requiring full clinical trials.12 And far too many medical devices continue to reach the market without any clinical trials at all.13 These are areas that cry out for more attention from organized medicine to ensure patient safety. For our federal watchdog agencies, our clinical guidelines, our pharmacopeia, our educational resources, our state laws, and our individual clinical relationships to be grounded in trust and science, physicians and patients will have to claim more power in these debates. It is fair to say that with my background in medicine and medical history, I never expected to become the Executive Director of a nonprofit organization. But I have always been drawn to visionaries. I had the good fortune to help unite this multispecialty band of serious idealists, this growing force for good. NPA’s presidents have included asurgeon, Dr Vaias; four family practice physicians–Drs Evans, Bettigole, Sc.