To control for reporting error and variability in types and dose

To control for reporting error and variability in types and dose of services (e.g., Rogers et al, 2012; Wetherby et al, 2014). In the current study, all children received the same early intervention program with equivalent dose and type of intervention. While these data suggest that focusing on core deficits can result in important changes in parent and child outcomes, they also raise questions about individual differences in child and parent outcomes. Overall, get Lixisenatide Clinical effect sizes were large for the primary outcome, and small to moderate on secondary outcomes. Sustainability (i.e., maintenance of treatment gains) was limited to the primary outcome measure of joint engagement. Future studies should strive for achieving a better understanding of the active ingredients of the treatment and profiles of children and parents most likely to benefit from specific early interventions.Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptAcknowledgmentsThis study was supported by NICHD, Autism Center of Excellence P50-HD-055784, Determinants of Social, Communicative, and Other Core Deficits in Autism (Bookheimer, PI) project 4, Optimizing Communication in Toddlers with Autism (Kasari, PI), Clinical trials.gov # NCT00999778. We appreciate the contributions of our therapists and coders: Janet Bang, Marina Farberov, Amy Fuller, Kelly Goods, Dalia Kabab, Kathy Lawton, Sara Levitt, Cordelia Ross, and our families and children.
Reductionism is a `divide and conquer’ approach and assumes that complex problems in cellular systems are solvable by reducing biological processes into more basic units 1. This research strategy has dominated biomedical research for many years and made great progress in identifying many critical components accounting for specific cellular phenotypes and human diseases. Owing to the complexity of biological systems, however, many important questions cannot be answered using reductionist approaches alone that typically focus on individual molecular components 2. In the past two decades, a variety of highthroughput technologies have been developed, such as cDNA microarrays, next-generation sequencing, precision mass spectrometry, and yeast two-hybrid assays 3?. These technologies are capable of measuring the abundance of numerous components of biological systems simultaneously and have generated massive amounts of `omics data. With the*Correspondence to: [email protected]. Conflicts of interest: The authors have declared no conflicts of interest for this article.Wang et al.Pageaccumulation of such experimental data, systems biology has emerged as a new approach to biology that bridges quantitative sciences and experimental biology in order to derive biological functions as system-level properties. Researchers increasingly realize that the functions of biological systems are not fully Pyrvinium embonate side effects accounted for by independent individual components, but, rather, by the complex interactions between molecular components and their environment (the exposome) 7, 8. Reductionist approaches are, therefore, insufficient for fully addressing biological phenomena in this way. High-throughput technologies drive systems biology to become a valuable approach for investigating multi-dimensional molecular biology in complex human diseases 9. One of the major challenges in the era of `omics is how to mine biological knowledge and generate novel mechanistic insights from the sea of high-throughput data. Obviously, handling such biological.To control for reporting error and variability in types and dose of services (e.g., Rogers et al, 2012; Wetherby et al, 2014). In the current study, all children received the same early intervention program with equivalent dose and type of intervention. While these data suggest that focusing on core deficits can result in important changes in parent and child outcomes, they also raise questions about individual differences in child and parent outcomes. Overall, clinical effect sizes were large for the primary outcome, and small to moderate on secondary outcomes. Sustainability (i.e., maintenance of treatment gains) was limited to the primary outcome measure of joint engagement. Future studies should strive for achieving a better understanding of the active ingredients of the treatment and profiles of children and parents most likely to benefit from specific early interventions.Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptAcknowledgmentsThis study was supported by NICHD, Autism Center of Excellence P50-HD-055784, Determinants of Social, Communicative, and Other Core Deficits in Autism (Bookheimer, PI) project 4, Optimizing Communication in Toddlers with Autism (Kasari, PI), Clinical trials.gov # NCT00999778. We appreciate the contributions of our therapists and coders: Janet Bang, Marina Farberov, Amy Fuller, Kelly Goods, Dalia Kabab, Kathy Lawton, Sara Levitt, Cordelia Ross, and our families and children.
Reductionism is a `divide and conquer’ approach and assumes that complex problems in cellular systems are solvable by reducing biological processes into more basic units 1. This research strategy has dominated biomedical research for many years and made great progress in identifying many critical components accounting for specific cellular phenotypes and human diseases. Owing to the complexity of biological systems, however, many important questions cannot be answered using reductionist approaches alone that typically focus on individual molecular components 2. In the past two decades, a variety of highthroughput technologies have been developed, such as cDNA microarrays, next-generation sequencing, precision mass spectrometry, and yeast two-hybrid assays 3?. These technologies are capable of measuring the abundance of numerous components of biological systems simultaneously and have generated massive amounts of `omics data. With the*Correspondence to: [email protected]. Conflicts of interest: The authors have declared no conflicts of interest for this article.Wang et al.Pageaccumulation of such experimental data, systems biology has emerged as a new approach to biology that bridges quantitative sciences and experimental biology in order to derive biological functions as system-level properties. Researchers increasingly realize that the functions of biological systems are not fully accounted for by independent individual components, but, rather, by the complex interactions between molecular components and their environment (the exposome) 7, 8. Reductionist approaches are, therefore, insufficient for fully addressing biological phenomena in this way. High-throughput technologies drive systems biology to become a valuable approach for investigating multi-dimensional molecular biology in complex human diseases 9. One of the major challenges in the era of `omics is how to mine biological knowledge and generate novel mechanistic insights from the sea of high-throughput data. Obviously, handling such biological.