Ek Das), S.C. and S.S. (Shreya Some); writing--original draftEk Das), S.C. and S.S. (Shreya Some);

Ek Das), S.C. and S.S. (Shreya Some); writing–original draft
Ek Das), S.C. and S.S. (Shreya Some); writing–original draft preparation, O.L., V.J., S.S. (Samridh Sharma), S.C., N.D., A.M. and S.S. (Shreya Some); writing–review and editing, J.R., A.D. (Abhishek Das) and D.L.D.; visualization, O.L., S.C. and D.L.D.; supervision, B.P., B.R. and B.T.; project administration, B.P., J.R., P.B., A.D. (Anupam Debsarkar) and L.P.; funding acquisition, P.B., B.P. and J.R. All authors have study and agreed to the published Bomedemstat supplier version of the manuscript. Funding: This analysis received no external funding and is usually a co-funded effort by Environmental Defense Fund, Indian Institute of Science and Jadavpur University. Institutional Overview Board Statement: Not applicable. Informed Consent Statement: Not applicable. Data Availability Statement: Not applicable. Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.Appendix ATable A1. Names of IDEEA regions, 34-region version. Code AN APY AR AS BR CH CT DL DN GA GJD HP HR JH JK KA KLY Name Andaman and Nicobar Andhra Pradesh and a part of Puducherry Arunachal Pradesh Assam Bihar Chandigarh Chhattisgarh Delhi Dadra and Nagar Haveli Goa Gujarat, Daman, and Diu Himachal Pradesh Haryana Jharkhand Jammu and Kashmir Karnataka Kerala and a part of Puducherry Code LD MH ML MN MP MZ NL OR PB RJ SK TG TNY TR UP UT WB Name Lakshadweep Maharashtra Meghalaya Manipur Madhya Pradesh Mizoram Nagaland Odisha Punjab Rajasthan Sikkim Telangana Tamil Nadu and part of Puducherry Tripura Uttar Pradesh Uttarakhand West BengalEnergies 2021, 14, 7063 Energies 2021, 14, x FOR PEER REVIEWEnergies 2021, 14, x FOR PEER REVIEW30 of 57 29 of29 ofFigure A1. IDEEA spatial division, 34-region version. Figure A1. IDEEAFigure A1. IDEEA34-region version. spatial division, spatial division, 34-region version.Figure A2. Annual average capacity variables of alternative form of PV trackers: 41-year average for Figure A2. Annual average The figure demonstrates differences intrackers:production applying alternative tracking India. Notes: capacity factors of alternative sort of PV power 41-year average for India. Notes: The figure demonstrates variations intotal annual production is relatively low forsystems. The total annual productiononerelais systems. The energy production working with alternative tracking India among the VBIT-4 medchemexpress models, and Figure A2. Annual typical capacity aspects of alternative style of PV trackers: 41-year typical for India. Notes: The figure the tively low for India among the models, as well as the 1 (tilted) tracker might be a cost-effective alternative. (tilted) tracker might be a cost-effective solution. demonstrates variations in energy production making use of alternative tracking systems. The total annual production is rela-tively low for India among the models, plus the 1 (tilted) tracker may possibly be a cost-effective alternative.Energies 2021, 14, 7063 Energies 2021, 14, x FOR PEER REVIEW31 of30 ofFigure A3. Annual typical wind energy capacity factor profiles, depending on MERRA-2 data (50 m) and Figure A3. Annual typical wind energy capacity factor profiles, according to MERRA-2 information (50 m) and extrapolated (100 m extrapolated (one hundred m and 150 m) with dynamic Hellmann constant (making use of 10 m and 50 m MERRA-2 information). and 150 m) with dynamic Hellmann continual (employing ten m and 50 m MERRA-2 data).Energies 2021, 14, 7063 PEER Evaluation Energies 2021, 14, x FOR32 of 55 31 ofFigure 4. Annual typical generation profile of wind turbines at 50 m hub height by year and area, onshore and offshore (.off) areas. Note: The figure demonstrates re.