Share this post on:

Bub1 depletion from HeLa cells causes an increase in the G2/M population of HeLa but not RPE1 cells and that Bub1 inhibition by BAY-320 or BAY-524 did not detectably affect cell cycle profiles in either cell line. We conclude that the inhibition of Bub1 kinase activity in either HeLa or RPE1 cells produces at most subtle effects on mitotic progression, whereas Bub1 depletion exerts more profound effects, at least in HeLa cells. These results are consistent with the demonstration that Bub1 kinase activity is not required for the development and viability of mice. Bub1 kinase regulates Shugoshin localization and chromatid cohesion One of the most interesting effects of Bub1 depletion described so far relates to sister chromatid cohesion. In particular, depletion of Bub1 was shown to cause persistent arm cohesion and a redistribution of Sgo proteins from centromeres to chromosome arms. To directly demonstrate a role for Bub1 kinase activity in sister chromatid cohesion, we analyzed chromosome spreads prepared from mitotic HeLa cells or RPE1 cells after treatment with Bub1 inhibitors or Bub1-specific siRNA for comparison. While mitotic chromosome spreads from nocodazole-treated control cells showed the expected X-shape structure, indicative of centromere cohesion, most cells treated with either Bub1 inhibitors or Bub1 siRNA showed sister chromatids whose arms remained paired. Moreover, centromeric levels of Sgo1 and Sgo2 were reduced to ~20% of control values in BAY-320 or BAY-524 treated cells and, concomitantly, a significant redistribution of Sgo2 to chromosome arms could be observed. We thus conclude that Bub1 catalytic activity contributes to the regulation of sister chromatid cohesion and the localization of Sgo proteins. Baron et al. eLife 2016;5:e12187. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.12187 5 of 26 Research article Cell biology Baron et al. eLife 2016;5:e12187. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.12187 6 of 26 Research article Cell biology Bub1 inhibition affects CPC localization In addition to preserving sister chromatid cohesion, Sgo1 and Sgo2 play important roles in the recruitment of the CPC, comprising Aurora B kinase. This prompted us to investigate the impact of Bub1 inhibition on Aurora B localization and Baron et al. eLife 2016;5:e12187. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.12187 7 of 26 Research article Cell biology activity. Consistent with the marked effects on centromere localization of Sgo1/2, we also observed significant effects of Bub1 inhibition on Aurora B localization. After treatment of HeLa cells with BAY-320 or BAY-524, all CPC subunits examined were partially displaced from centromeres. While Bub1 inhibition reduced centromeric levels of Aurora B, Borealin and INCENP by ~50%, depletion of Bub1 lowered centromere levels of these CPC components by ~70%. We emphasize that, due to a lack of resolution, these Piclidenoson price experiments do not discriminate between centromere- and KT-associated pools of the CPC. To examine the impact of Bub1 inhibition on the catalytic activity of Aurora B at both PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19825521 centromeres and chromosome arms, we next monitored phosphorylation of CENP-A Ser7 and histone H3 Ser10, respectively. Compared to control cells, both Bub1 inhibition and depletion reduced CENP-A and histone H3 phosphorylation by ~50% and ~1020%, respectively, suggesting that interference with Bub1 primarily affects Aurora B activity at centromeres. This conclusion was corroborated by showing that both inhibition and depletion of Bub1 reduced the centromere association of the Aurora B

Share this post on:

Author: nucleoside analogue