Reflectivity values, with maximums of roughly 39 dBZ close to the surface, while the minimum

Reflectivity values, with maximums of roughly 39 dBZ close to the surface, while the minimum occurs in the upper limit of your troposphere, with values close to 21 dBZ. In the other extreme, the T1 region, with small or no electrical activity recorded 15 of throughout the TRMM FM4-64 supplier orbits inside the studied period, has maximum values of approximately 36 22 dBZ close to the surface, and minimum values of 19 dBZ also in the upper limit from the troposphere.Figure 7. Average reflectivity profiles (dBZ) as a as a function oflightning density categories T1 ( T1 Figure 7. Typical reflectivity profiles (dBZ) function from the the lightning density categories -1 0.1 flash km-2 year2 ; black line); T2 (in between 0.1 and two.eight flash km-2 year-1; green line); T3 (between – (0.1 flash km- year-1 ; black line); T2 (among 0.1 and 2.eight flash km-1 2 year-1 ; green line); T3 two.eight and 6.8 flash km-2 year-1; blue 2 and T4 6.8 flash km-2 year ; red line). The – line); -1 ; blue(aboveand T4 (above six.8 flash km-2 year-1regions (in between 2.eight and six.eight flash km year line); ; red line). highlighted in shades of gray indicate the microphysical layers: warm (white), mixed (light gray) The regions highlighted in shades of gray indicate the microphysical layers: warm (white), mixed and glacial phase (dark gray). (light gray) and glacial phase (dark gray).4. Discussion In the other intense, the T1 area, with tiny or no electrical activity recorded throughout 4.1. Connection amongst the studied period, has maximum values of about 36 dBZ the TRMM orbits in Clouds’ Microphysical Properties and Lightning Occurrence The distinct behavior of IWP distributions also at the upper limit of of a strong close to the surface, and minimum values of 19 dBZ supports the hypothesisthe troposphere. correlation involving the generation of electrical charges, and consequent lightning 4. Discussion production, together with the frozen water particle mass inside the storm clouds [99]. Steiner and four.1. Relationship involving partnership of ice particles and convective clouds, obtaining that Smith [100] established theClouds’ Microphysical Properties and Lightning Occurrence the existence of high-densityof IWP distributions supports convective precipitation, along with the distinct behavior ice particles is indicative on the hypothesis of a robust corregraupel may be regarded as as particles that mark the and consequent lightning production, lation among the generation of electrical charges, boundary between convective and stratiform precipitation. particle mass inside the storm cloudsparticles demands Smith [100] using the frozen water The development of high-density graupel [99]. Steiner and updrafts on established the partnership of ice particles and convectiveclassifications. that the existhe order of two m s-1, which corroborates frequently held clouds, finding tence of high-density ice particles is indicative of convective precipitation, and graupel may be regarded as as particles that mark the boundary involving convective and stratiform precipitation. The development of high-density graupel particles needs updrafts around the order of two m s-1 , which corroborates frequently held classifications. With regard for the order of magnitude with the FH values discovered, they may be consistent with a earlier survey MAC-VC-PABC-ST7612AA1 manufacturer carried out with radar information obtained by the TRMM and compared to that obtained from temperature information from the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) [95], exactly where the average values for regions in NEB vary involving 4500 and 5000.