Share this post on:

empty and NF3xmir16 cells were xenografted subcutaneously into the left and right hind flanks of each 2901691 nude mouse and then bioluminescent imaging and 99mTc-pertechnetate gamma camera imaging were acquired. As shown in 5 Noninvasive Visualization of MicroRNA-16 from NF-empty cells, similarly for the difference of luciferase activities measured in vitro. After the intraperitoneal injection of 99mTc-pertechnetate at 18.5 MBq, gamma camera imaging was performed. In contrast to NF-empty tumors, which showed prominent uptake of 99mTc-pertechnetate, NF-3xmir16 tumors showed negligible uptake, indicating endogenous miRNA-16 reduced the hNIS expression. Physiologic uptake was also observed at the sites of the thyroid, stomach and bladder, in which hNIS is normally expressed. Regions of interest analysis showed that hNIS activity decreased significantly in NF-3xmir16 xenografts compared with that in NF-empty xenografts. After imaging, we collected and weighed the NF-empty and NF-3xmir16 tumors. The results showed they had the same weights, indicated that the differences in signal intensity are indeed due to endogenous miRNA-16 function but not cell numbers. target sites in the construct. The in vitro bioluminescence imaging results demonstrated that VP-16 and 5-FU had no inhibitory effect on the luminescence intensity, whereas CDDP still reduced the luminescence signal, indicating that CDDP may inhibit cellular growth but not activate endogenous miRNA16 expression. On the other hand, MMC and ADR were found to slightly increase the luminescence intensity in both NF-3xmir16 and NF-empty cells, which may result from promoting cellular proliferation. To verify that miRNA-16 activation participated into anticancer effects from VP-16 and 5-FU, Q-PCR were performed to determine the miRNA-16 level in NF-3xmir16 cells exposure to anticancer drugs treatments. 9504387 Accordingly, miRNA-16 expression was upregulated significantly after VP-16 or 5-FU treatments in SGC7901 cells compared to the untreated control cells, while MMC, ADR and CDDP had minor effect on miRNA-16 expression. Visualization of expression change of miRNA-16 in MDR gastric cancer cells in vitro and in vivo The expression change of miRNA-16 in drug resistant gastric cancer cells was detected via the Fluc and hNIS activity by bioluminescence imaging and 131I MedChemExpress DHMEQ radioiodide uptake assays. Both Fluc activity and hNIS activity increased by about 1.5 fold in NF-3xmir16/VCR cells as compared with that in NF-3xmir16 cells, which suggested that miRNA-16 was downregulated in NF-3xmir16/VCR cells. To verify the results obtained by reporter gene system, quantitative RT-PCR was carried out to analysis the differential expression of miRNA-16 in these two cell lines. In accordance with the reporter gene system data, Q-PCR showed decreased miRNA-16 levels in NF-3xmir16/VCR compared to its counterpart NF-3xmir16 cells. For noninvasive quantitative monitoring of miRNA-16 differential expression in MDR gastric cancer cells in vivo, bioluminescent imaging and 99mTc-pertechnetate gamma camera imaging were performed. The bioluminescent imaging demonstrated that luminescence signals were about 1.7 fold increases in the NF3xmir16/VCR xenografts versus NF-3xmir16 xenografts, in accordance with the increases of luciferase activity measured in vitro. The injection of 99mTcpertechnetate and the acquisition of gamma camera imaging indicated that a significantly higher accumulation of 99mTcpertechnetate was observed in NF-3xmir16

Share this post on:

Author: nucleoside analogue