Y resistance and dynamic compliance were determined.Data analysisData were analysed using GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software, CA) and are represented as the mean ?the order U0126-EtOH standard error of the mean (SEM). One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post-test was used to determine significance between data with multiple GSK1363089MedChemExpress EXEL-2880 comparisons. Unpaired Student’s t-test was used to determine differences between two groups. One-way repeated measures ANOVA and Bonferroni’s post-test were used to determine significance for AHR data. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results Effects of AAD and administration of KSpn on TLR2 and TLR4 mRNA expression in the lungIn this study we used established models of OVA-induced AAD and KSpn-mediated suppression of AAD [16, 19]. We first assessed the expression of Tlr2 and Tlr4 mRNA in the lung tissues of Wt mice in these models. Mice were sensitized and challenged with OVA to induce AAD (Fig 1A). TLR mRNA expression during sensitization and after challenge was assessed. There were no changes in Tlr2 expression in AAD (OVA groups) compared to non-allergic (Saline) controls (Fig 1B and 1C). By contrast, Tlr4 expression increased 24 h after OVA sensitization but returned to control levels after airway challenges. In S. pneumoniae-induced suppression of AAD, mice were treated with KSpn intratracheally then sensitized and challenged with OVA to induce AAD. The expression of Tlr2 significantly increased 24 h after KSpn treatment and OVA sensitization (KSpn/OVA), but not after challenge, compared to untreated allergic (OVA) controls (Fig 1B and 1C). In addition there were significant increases in Tlr4 expression following KSpn treatment and OVA sensitization, which was sustained after OVA challenge.Roles of TLR2, TLR4 and MyD88 in AAD and KSpn-mediated suppression of eosinophils in BALF in AADWe then assessed the contribution of TLR2 and TLR4 to AAD and KSpn-mediated suppression of AAD using TLR2-/-, TLR4-/- and TLR2/4-/- mice. In addition, we used mice deficient in the TLR2 and TLR4 adapter protein MyD88 (MyD88-/-). The induction of AAD was characterized by significant increases in the numbers of eosinophils in the BALF compared to the respective non-allergic controls, in all strains of mice (Fig 2A). Notably, the number of eosinophils in TLR4-/- mice was attenuated compared to Wt mice, indicating that the infiltration of these cells into BALF is partially dependent on TLR4. As we have shown previously [16], the administration of KSpn led to a substantial and significant reduction in the number of eosinophils in the BALF of Wt mice with AAD compared to untreated Wt allergic controls. KSpn administration also partially but significantly reduced eosinophil infiltration into the airways of TLR2-/- mice compared to untreated TLR2-/- allergic controls. This indicates that TLR2 partially mediates the protective effects of KSpn on BALF eosinophils. However, administration of KSpn did not affect eosinophil infiltration in TLR4-/-, TLR2/4-/- or MyD88-/- mice compared to their respective untreated allergic controls. Importantly nevertheless, the affect of KSpn on eosinophil infiltration in Wt mice was significantly greater than in TLR2-/-, TLR4-/-, TLR2/4-/- and MyD88-/- mice.PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0156402 June 16,5 /TLRs in Suppression of Allergic Airways DiseaseFig 2. Airway and blood eosinophilia in AAD and KSpn-induced suppression of AAD in MyD88 and TLR deficient mice. Six-week old BALB/c Wt, MyD88-/-, TLR2-/-, TLR4-/-.Y resistance and dynamic compliance were determined.Data analysisData were analysed using GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software, CA) and are represented as the mean ?the standard error of the mean (SEM). One-way ANOVA with Dunnett's post-test was used to determine significance between data with multiple comparisons. Unpaired Student's t-test was used to determine differences between two groups. One-way repeated measures ANOVA and Bonferroni's post-test were used to determine significance for AHR data. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results Effects of AAD and administration of KSpn on TLR2 and TLR4 mRNA expression in the lungIn this study we used established models of OVA-induced AAD and KSpn-mediated suppression of AAD [16, 19]. We first assessed the expression of Tlr2 and Tlr4 mRNA in the lung tissues of Wt mice in these models. Mice were sensitized and challenged with OVA to induce AAD (Fig 1A). TLR mRNA expression during sensitization and after challenge was assessed. There were no changes in Tlr2 expression in AAD (OVA groups) compared to non-allergic (Saline) controls (Fig 1B and 1C). By contrast, Tlr4 expression increased 24 h after OVA sensitization but returned to control levels after airway challenges. In S. pneumoniae-induced suppression of AAD, mice were treated with KSpn intratracheally then sensitized and challenged with OVA to induce AAD. The expression of Tlr2 significantly increased 24 h after KSpn treatment and OVA sensitization (KSpn/OVA), but not after challenge, compared to untreated allergic (OVA) controls (Fig 1B and 1C). In addition there were significant increases in Tlr4 expression following KSpn treatment and OVA sensitization, which was sustained after OVA challenge.Roles of TLR2, TLR4 and MyD88 in AAD and KSpn-mediated suppression of eosinophils in BALF in AADWe then assessed the contribution of TLR2 and TLR4 to AAD and KSpn-mediated suppression of AAD using TLR2-/-, TLR4-/- and TLR2/4-/- mice. In addition, we used mice deficient in the TLR2 and TLR4 adapter protein MyD88 (MyD88-/-). The induction of AAD was characterized by significant increases in the numbers of eosinophils in the BALF compared to the respective non-allergic controls, in all strains of mice (Fig 2A). Notably, the number of eosinophils in TLR4-/- mice was attenuated compared to Wt mice, indicating that the infiltration of these cells into BALF is partially dependent on TLR4. As we have shown previously [16], the administration of KSpn led to a substantial and significant reduction in the number of eosinophils in the BALF of Wt mice with AAD compared to untreated Wt allergic controls. KSpn administration also partially but significantly reduced eosinophil infiltration into the airways of TLR2-/- mice compared to untreated TLR2-/- allergic controls. This indicates that TLR2 partially mediates the protective effects of KSpn on BALF eosinophils. However, administration of KSpn did not affect eosinophil infiltration in TLR4-/-, TLR2/4-/- or MyD88-/- mice compared to their respective untreated allergic controls. Importantly nevertheless, the affect of KSpn on eosinophil infiltration in Wt mice was significantly greater than in TLR2-/-, TLR4-/-, TLR2/4-/- and MyD88-/- mice.PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0156402 June 16,5 /TLRs in Suppression of Allergic Airways DiseaseFig 2. Airway and blood eosinophilia in AAD and KSpn-induced suppression of AAD in MyD88 and TLR deficient mice. Six-week old BALB/c Wt, MyD88-/-, TLR2-/-, TLR4-/-.
Nucleoside Analogues nucleoside-analogue.com
Just another WordPress site