Ce when they cross territorial boundaries. Gang membership and multi-type delinquency

Ce when they cross territorial boundaries. Gang membership and multi-type delinquency also peaked in middle to late adolescence for most youth, whereas specialization in serious violence declined steadily with age. Additionally, Black youth were less likely to Pamapimod dose engage only in serious violence or to combine serious theft and serious violence than non-Black youth, but were more likely to join gangs and to combine violence with drug sales. Together, these findings highlight that both gang involvement and certain kinds of multitype delinquency are limited to adolescence and that different youth may be more vulnerable at different times (i.e., young men who come of age during periods of heightened street crime, Black youth who may on average be exposed to greater contextual risk, and youth whose moves to new neighborhoods exposes them to increased risk). Our results also underscore the fruitfulness of distinguishing developmental patterns of co-occurring drug selling and serious violence or drug selling, serious theft, and serious violence from specialization in serious violence, combining serious violence and serious theft, or other configurations of serious delinquency in future studies of gang members. We encourage replication of our findings and the use of theories of developmental and life-course criminology to illuminate them (Farrington, 2003; Le Blanc Loeber, 1998; Loeber, White, Burke, 2012). We also encourage R1503 chemical information extension of our results to identify latent groups with different over-time changes in multi-type delinquency, for example by using repeated measures latent class analyses of the types of co-occurrence variables that we defined at each wave (Collins Lanza, 2010) or by using multilevel latent class models which establish latent classes of types of delinquency within waves and then latent classes with different across-wave patterns of these delinquency types (Vermunt, 2003, 2008). In these ways, our within-time focus on specialization and versatility in a particular year might be combined with an over-time focus, allowing for the identification of specialization orJ Res Adolesc. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2015 June 01.NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author ManuscriptGordon et al.Pageversatility in multi-type delinquency over the life course. Such models might also identify subgroups of boys who are consistently violent, but transition from specializing in violence during childhood and early adolescence to combining violence with drug selling, serious theft and gang participation in middle and late adolescence. Our study has several limitations. As noted above, our findings may not generalize beyond Pittsburgh in the 1990s. It is also the case that even though our sample was relatively large, with over 600 participants, cell sizes became small as we looked at particular combinations of behaviors. Studies with larger sample sizes or strategic sampling for co-occurrence might be better able to identify risks associated with rare sets of serious delinquent behaviors. Measures of early antisocial behavior, defined in even more equivalent ways between cohorts, might also identify greater distinctions between boys who do and do not exhibit early problem behaviors. Finally, the PYS sampled only boys, and our findings may not generalize to girls. With these limitations in mind, our study contributes to the existing literature. We demonstrated the substantial co-occurrence of serious delinquency amon.Ce when they cross territorial boundaries. Gang membership and multi-type delinquency also peaked in middle to late adolescence for most youth, whereas specialization in serious violence declined steadily with age. Additionally, Black youth were less likely to engage only in serious violence or to combine serious theft and serious violence than non-Black youth, but were more likely to join gangs and to combine violence with drug sales. Together, these findings highlight that both gang involvement and certain kinds of multitype delinquency are limited to adolescence and that different youth may be more vulnerable at different times (i.e., young men who come of age during periods of heightened street crime, Black youth who may on average be exposed to greater contextual risk, and youth whose moves to new neighborhoods exposes them to increased risk). Our results also underscore the fruitfulness of distinguishing developmental patterns of co-occurring drug selling and serious violence or drug selling, serious theft, and serious violence from specialization in serious violence, combining serious violence and serious theft, or other configurations of serious delinquency in future studies of gang members. We encourage replication of our findings and the use of theories of developmental and life-course criminology to illuminate them (Farrington, 2003; Le Blanc Loeber, 1998; Loeber, White, Burke, 2012). We also encourage extension of our results to identify latent groups with different over-time changes in multi-type delinquency, for example by using repeated measures latent class analyses of the types of co-occurrence variables that we defined at each wave (Collins Lanza, 2010) or by using multilevel latent class models which establish latent classes of types of delinquency within waves and then latent classes with different across-wave patterns of these delinquency types (Vermunt, 2003, 2008). In these ways, our within-time focus on specialization and versatility in a particular year might be combined with an over-time focus, allowing for the identification of specialization orJ Res Adolesc. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2015 June 01.NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author ManuscriptGordon et al.Pageversatility in multi-type delinquency over the life course. Such models might also identify subgroups of boys who are consistently violent, but transition from specializing in violence during childhood and early adolescence to combining violence with drug selling, serious theft and gang participation in middle and late adolescence. Our study has several limitations. As noted above, our findings may not generalize beyond Pittsburgh in the 1990s. It is also the case that even though our sample was relatively large, with over 600 participants, cell sizes became small as we looked at particular combinations of behaviors. Studies with larger sample sizes or strategic sampling for co-occurrence might be better able to identify risks associated with rare sets of serious delinquent behaviors. Measures of early antisocial behavior, defined in even more equivalent ways between cohorts, might also identify greater distinctions between boys who do and do not exhibit early problem behaviors. Finally, the PYS sampled only boys, and our findings may not generalize to girls. With these limitations in mind, our study contributes to the existing literature. We demonstrated the substantial co-occurrence of serious delinquency amon.