And eleven times in groups II and III. Growth data are
And eleven times in groups II and III. Growth data are summarized in Table 2. At the beginning of the trial one-way ANOVA showed no statistically significant differences in body TF14016 chemical information weight (p = 0.990) between the groups of growers. No statistically significant difference in ADG (p = 0.692) was observed between groups at the end of the trial. The highestTable 2 Body weight (BW; mean ?SD) and average daily gain (ADG; mean ?SD) in three groups of 7 week old growers before (initial BW) and after (final BW) three week feeding trialInitial BW (kg) group I group II group III p value (one-way ANOVA) 15.62 ?1.61 15.56 ?1.88 15.51 ?2.19 0.990 Final BW (kg) 37.64 ?5.25 36.29 ?6.92 35.85 ?5.55 0.761 ADG (kg) 1.053 ?0.217 0.987 ?0.282 0.969 ?0.230 0.ADG (numerically) was recorded in Group I (basal diet) – 1.053 ?0.217 kg versus 0.987 ?0.282 kg (Group II) and 0.969 ?0.230 kg (Group III). Data analysis (one-way ANOVA) showed no statistically significant differences in any of selected blood parameters between the three groups of growers, neither at the beginning nor the end of the trial. However, most of the selected blood parameters, individually for each group, differed significantly between the beginning and end of the feeding trial (Tables 3, 4, 5 and 6). Among the biochemical parameters (Table 3), the level of protein, an indicator of adequacy of protein in terms of quality and quantity in the diet [42], at the beginning of the trial was below the lower value of the reference range [43] in all three groups of growers. After three weeks feeding it had increased significantly in all three groups, though the values remained below the lower value of reference range. Fe and Cu concentrations were within the reference ranges [43] in all three groups of growers before and after the feeding trial, but increased significantly (paired t-test) in the group of growers fed the basal diet only (Group I). No diet related changes of haematological parameters (Tables 4 and 5) were found (one-way ANOVA) after the three weeks feeding trial. Initial and final values of most of the haematological parameters were within their reference ranges [44]. Comparison of the results before and after the trial, individually for each group of growers (paired t-test), showed statistically significant increasesTable 3 Biochemical parameters (mean ?SD) in three groups of 7 week old growers before (Initial values), and after (Final values) feeding trialInitial values Final values Reference range [42] protein (g/L) group I group II group III p value (one-way ANOVA) Fe (mol/L) group I group II group III p value (one-way ANOVA) Cu (mol/L) group I group II group III p value (one-way ANOVA) 26.17 ?5.29* 31.25 ?2.42 29.75 ?3.36 27.25 ?7.10 0.272 30.76 ?2.93 30.97 ?3.05 0.916 17.60 ?5.85* 19.73 ?6.78 16.97 ?7.31 0.573 23.0 ?8.10 21.96 ?5.56 19.62 ?6.30 0.462 20.9 – 43.8 52.2 ?2.6* 53.7 ?4.2* 51.9 ?4.4* 0.449 66.8 ?3.2 64.3 ?6.0 63.1 ?3.5 0.139 16.3 – 35.6 79 -* p PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25609842 < 0.05, paired t-test used for the comparison between initial and final values in individual groups of growersStukelj et al. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 2010, 52:19 http://www.actavetscand.com/content/52/1/Page 5 ofTable 4 Complete blood count parameters (mean ?SD) in three groups of 7 week old growers before (Initial values) and after (Final values) feeding trialInitial values WBC (109/L) group I group II group III p value (one-way ANOVA) RBC (1012/L) group I group II group III p value (one-way ANOVA) Hgb (g/L) group I group II grou.
Nucleoside Analogues nucleoside-analogue.com
Just another WordPress site